Interstellar Film Review: The Movie Ignores Scientific Evidences To Get In The Way Of Their Plot! Why Does Science Is Against The Film?

Tags

Trailers and reviews left moviegoers curious about Interstellar. The plot is about the Earth shriveled by dying crops, dust bowls and voyages further than the solar system likely by a wormhole.

For science fiction, films like A Space Odyssey in 2001, the plot is limited to the laws of physics. On the contrary, science fantasy films like Star Wars and Star Trek overlook whenever science gets in the way of their plots. Earth is dying in 3 hours and NASA is finding solutions to save humanity, led by Michael Caine. Just when the problem turns risky, a wormhole appears new Saturn. The questions are: why is there a wormhole there and who put it there. It makes spaceships travel to another galaxy, where they get inside a region of space beside a black hole, Gargantua and other planets that humanity could live in.

Kip Thorne, a retired Caltech physicist was hired by Nolan as the film's scientific consultant, a significant role hat he is recognized as an executive producer. The scientifically plausible wormhole was produced by the filmmakers. Although, we don't know whether wormholes are real, but its like this device for making interstellar travel likely due to depend on Star Trekkiam quicker than light warp drives, which are impossible physically. The film's wormhole is stunning visually, but fans likely never know whether it has any link to physical reality.

The film shows a greatly luminous disk of gas accretion, although, there's no apparent source like a star of accreting matter. Literally, human inhabitants and spacecraft got high-energy X-rays from the disk. Making things worse, making it too close to such low mass black hole would make the crew to the hole's extreme tidal force and spaghettification would stretch literally the ultrahin strand of protoplasm.

The final part of the film peaks even more into the scientific implausibility, although we don't want to mess up the ending. The second of the last scene is a surreal quality that is reminiscent of the sequence of stargate from 2001. Still the film could still be considered as emotionally and intellectually satisfying.

Join the Discussion

Latest Photo Slide Shows

Real Time Analytics