Ben Affleck Spotted Without Wedding Ring After Divorce; Jennifer Garner Changes Settlement Over Nanny?

Tags
Ben Affleck
Jennifer Garner
World news

Ben Affleck has finally stopped wearing his wedding ring as another rumor cropped up about Jennifer Garner changing the divorce settlement because of hatred toward the "Batman V Superman" star and ex-nanny, Christine Ouzounian.

According to the new report from Entertainment Tonight, the photograph, taken in Los Angeles, was the first time that the "Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice" star was snapped without his wedding ring on.

"An eyewitness tells ET that the 45-year-old actor also left his ring at home when he went on a family outing to Underwood Family Farms in Moorpark, California on Monday," it said. "Ben was accompanied by his three children -- Violet, 9, Seraphina, 6, and Samuel, 3 -- as well as a nanny for the children."

Just this weekend, Ben Affleck was still wearing his wedding ring while he bonded with the kids in Los Angeles.

Meanwhile, the National Enquirer, per Celebrity Dirty Laundry, has claimed that Jennifer Garner has allowed her anger on Ben Affleck and the nanny to get the better of her as the "Elektra" actress is changing the divorce settlement.

"One of their sources says Jennifer is broken up over how Ben ripped their family apart and is humiliated by recent circumstances like him running around behind her back with their former nanny Christine Ouzounian," CDL noted.

"Jennifer had planned to keep things amicable, but can't hold her tongue any more."

But the affair wasn't the only reason that was purportedly responsible for the divorce.

Multiple rumors have claimed that Ben Affleck was back to his alcohol and gambling problem which led to the breakdown in the marriage of the "Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice" star with Jennifer Garner.

A rep for Ben Affleck has denied that he had an affair with the nanny. The statement read Page Six, "The story is complete garbage and full of lies. You shouldn't be able to hide behind 'blind sources' and attempt to destroy families going through a difficult time."

"The tabloid [Us Weekly] decided to construct stories in order to sell magazines. It's like story time in kindergarten. It's shameful and desperate."

Join the Discussion

Latest News

Real Time Analytics