There seems to be various problems calling to be addressed.
#1 Statement released by Park Shi Hoo's representatives on March 7
Woman A begins to worry about a pregnancy after 11PM of February 15. Suspecting signs of pregnancy not even one day after sexual intercourse is questionable since it goes against common sense of pregnancies.
#2 Statement released by the police on March 11, after the DNA results come out.
According to the results form the National Scientific, Criminal & Investigation Laboratory, the DNA that was found on woman A are in fact Park Shi Hoo's DNA.
#3 Interview with Park Shi Hoo's representatives
According to Park Shi Hoo, woman A was conscious during the sexual intercourse and she was very active during both, first and second, times the sexual intercourse occurred. Woman A insisted on birth control so Park Shi Hoo used a condom. If she was unconscious from intoxication, she would not have been able to show that kind of attitude.
March 13, Park Shi Hoo, his friend K and accuser A have all been investigated under the polygraph machine. The date of the incident was over a month ago but there isn't any progress in the case.
The three statements mentioned above are the most dependable out of all the evidence that have been revealed so far. However, the second statement and the third statement seem to conflict.
If Park Shi Hoo did indeed use birth control during sexual intercourse, there is a large chance that there would not be any DNA present. However, his DNA was found and it is a cold hard fact. One of those statements, therefore, must not be the truth.
Park Shi Hoo's DNA that was found does not indicate that there was any forced sexual intercourse. However, the DNA found on the woman A's reproductive organ shows proof that there was skin-on-skin contact.
A number of people are stating that the intercourse actually may have been forceful because of the DNA and the conflicting statements. However, all of this will be up to the court to judge.
Also, looking at the first statement, Park Shi Hoo's representatives claim that the woman's premature worries about a pregnancy show the nature of her accusations. However, wouldn't a woman be more concerned about a pregnancy if the sexual intercourse was forced?
Park Shi Hoo, his friend K and woman A faced each other for further investigation by the police on March 14th.
This case is becoming more and more confusing as time passes and does not seem like it will end soon. There is no need for statements like, "I was fooled" or "I'm innocent", all Park Shi Hoo needs to prove now is that he was not forceful throughout their sexual intercourse.
